I really do feel like the only person who actually takes some joy in having a backlog. After all, it's MY fault my backlog exists in the first place. I've added nearly every monthly game we've ever gotten from PS+ (since 2012), and sales have been a huge positive side of being with Sony, I've spent thousands over the years. So why would I look at my backlog as something that's about to destroy my life? It's a great problem to have.
But it brings me to number 4 there. Maybe I just define "backlog" differently? I always considered it, not all the games I have access to, but within those, the ones I actually intend on playing. I currently have 1847 games at my disposal between the various PlayStation generations, my Switch and some retro consoles. Take the 500+ games I've already played from that. We're looking at about 1300 games left...however about 800 of those are PS+ titles, most of which I'll never play. Bringing me to about 500 games that would be in some kind of consideration...and out of those, I have 231 games I have every INTENTION of playing (whether I do or not remains to be seen), which is what I consider my actual "backlog".
So I guess for me, in that logic...I don't have anything in mine that I wouldn't want to play at all, none that are "not for me". I mean sure, you play something every once in awhile that you won't like, but I didn't know that before I bought it.
I don't know, people bring this topic up a lot like they made a huge mistake buying games. I just don't see it that way. I grew up playing a single stack of games over and over again, the fact that I can constantly play something new and (hopefully) engaging is just something I never thought would be possible back in the 90's/early 2000's. And sure we could all just....stop buying games until we tackle our backlog, but then...you now have a backlog of unbought games waiting for you to buy. Might as well just enjoy yourself.