FawltyPowers

I'm glad I'm old. I tried reading the JK Rowling controversy and it sounded like gibberish. This game looks promising, my daughter is particularly excited.

Arkham Asylum, Arkham City, Arkham Origins. Everyone hates on Arkham Origins, I hate on Arkham City DLC, more specifically Catwoman.

Top 3 longest games on my list 1. Castlevania Requiem: Symphony of the Night & Rondo of Blood (59 characters in length) 2. Middle-earth: Shadow of Mordor - Game of the Year Edition (57 characters in length) 3. Earth Defense Force 4.1: The Shadow of New Despair (50 characters in length)

This is great news if it turns out to be true. I enjoyed NGS2 a lot, getting absolutely destroyed and having to really learn the game to beat it, getting to each save point feeling like a victory. Not so fond of the co-op and getting carried through it but I know others did enjoy it. I'd like to play NGS and NG3, although as the poster above said and from what I've read, I'd prefer it if it was Razor's Edge. Will certainly be keeping my eye on this. Thanks.

I'd have to see a screenshot of the 60th platinum because I've never seen it (at least not since it changed years ago). Here are the milestones, correct me if I'm wrong: Platinums: 1 10 20 30 40 50 75 (milestone now for every 25 going up to 250) 250 (milestone now from every 50) Trophies: 1 500 1000 1337 1500 (milestone now for every 500 trophies going up to 5000) 5000 (milestone now for every 1000 trophies going up to 10000) 10000 (milestone now for every 5000 trophies)

I remember seeing the trailer to this and looking forward to it's release, oh well. You've not really sold it, but it's nice to know that after 2 years they've almost got it working.

Yes it was raised and discussed by YuriG 2 or 3 years ago

I'm not sure how any of us can't be happy with what they're offering, after all Sony's September PS+ e-mail will excitedly tell us we're getting £60.00 - £80.00 worth of free games. Seriously though, it's not very often I'll say anything negative about the games given, after all you can't suit everybody, but reading that these are on PS Now is unimpressive to say the least. EDIT: Had the e-mail, apparently they are worth £40.98, personally I'd move the decimal point a notch to the left.

If I were Sony I'd give the illusion of deleted trophy lists and it would be a bit like hiding games. For example give the user the option to delete the trophy list (the game would have to be un-installed first), if you confirm it the game would appear to be deleted from your trophy list, you would never see it and your stats would be adjusted accordingly. What would really happen is the game would have a flag applied in the background but it would still be there. Why? If the user was to then re-install the game, the trophy list would re-appear as it had before, all timestamps remain intact. This stops the obvious problems where people would start complaining because they'd lost a trophy list for good (we know this would be a massive problem), stops the problem of having a save file, restarting the game and potentially having trophies auto-popping or at the least trophies appearing out of sequence, cheated trophy timestamps will still remain.

#1 on Leaderboard, 100% profile, click on profile, list of Ratalaika games, roll eyes, click back #2 on Leaderboard, 100% profile, click on profile, list of Ratalaika games, roll eyes, click back #3 on Leaderboard, 100% profile, click on profile, list of Ratalaika games, roll eyes, click back #4 on Leaderboard, 100% profile, click on profile, list of Ratalaika games, roll eyes, click back I've done looking.

I'm glad you think it's awesome. It's possible I might be missing out but I'll live with it.

But why would I? Again, I iterate, if you have all the time and money in the world and you've tried everything else, then maybe yes.

It's a 9 year old game that reviewers bombed. Users did the same, so why would anyone go near it, especially now, unless you've played the better alternatives and have nothing else left. I've never played it, never will, when I see a review give it 3/10. I am interested to know why it isn't on your profile, or are you just getting round to it?

It's posts like this on unknown games I find interesting. I've got quite a variety of games in my library, most aren't on my profile yet and quite a few are more obscure titles with a player base of less than 500. I have some of them because comments are made on this forum, like yours and I'll look into it, read reviews, watch gameplay. This one isn't for me but like you say, its good to read up yourself as you never know what you can be missing out on.

Glad you enjoyed it but what you've written, coupled with what I just read about the game in a review (survival mechanics, it's painful to play but that is the point of it, fighting is clunky and unflattering) and I don't think I'd go near this even if it was free. It seems to be getting a cult following, it's aimed at a niche audience as you're not supposed to like it so 300 players seems about right to me.