Premium Member
 PSN Profile
  • Content count

  • Joined

  • Last visited

Community Reputation

381 Excellent

About SuperSaiyan3985

  • Rank
    Prince of all Saiyans
  • Birthday 07/29/99

Profile Information

Recent Profile Visitors

7,915 profile views
  1. So the nominees for The Game Awards have been announced, and here are my concerns:

    1. It's a crime Tommie Earl Jenkins wasn't nominated for his performance as Die-Hardman in Death Stranding. He truly blew me away, and IMO was more impressive than Norman Reedus as Sam seeing as how the latter barely even spoke throughout the game. 

    2. While I wasn't expecting Days Gone to be nominated for GOTY, I was expecting it get nominated for at least some of the stuff, but nope! Nothing. That's pretty ridiculous.

    3. As I predicted, Metro Exodus isn't getting any love whereas a mediocre game like Control got soooooo many nominations. 

    Not gonna list out my picks for each category, but I will say that Death Stranding is my choice for GOTY. What're your thoughts on the nominees?

    1. MidnightDragon


      The whole thing is a joke anyway.

    2. snakebit10


      @MidnightDragon Agreed, but I watch anyways. Mostly for new game announcements.

    3. MidnightDragon


      Probably PS5/Scarlett launch titles.

  2. How do you "place" a Tallneck?
  3. You're gonna have to name those off LOL I don't know them off the top of my head.
  4. We know all the rich Saudi oil mogul's are gonna buy it so it's pretty smart for them to sell it at that price if you ask me.
  5. You kidding me? Jak 2 and 3 are classics. Jak 1 is kinda shit. Problem for me with TFS is that it's too short.
  6. Well Jak 1 was released in 2001, and by the time R&C came out, Jak 2 was deep in development. Therefore saying that one "copied the other" is far-fetched.
  7. I wish a studio like Bluepoint would take hold of the franchise and give it the SOTC treatment. Would literally cream my pants if that happened. How is it a cheap rip off when it released a year prior to Ratchet & Clank? LOL. LOL I loved the "emo, heavy metal tattoo" known as WW. Just because WW has a vastly different style than SOT does not make it a bad game. Hahaha same. The heavy metal music just gets my blood pumping every time, the gore is badass, the Dahaka makes you shit your pants, the story is intriguing, and Kaileena's hot AF. Truly a teenager's game.
  8. Guess these games just aren't for everyone, because I absolutely adore the POP franchise. Would kill for a remake. Suit yourself.
  9. Oh please, you're being too harsh. Lots of mid-2000s games suffered from similar issues but are still revered by fans. The Jak franchise for instance? Love it, but the checkpoints are BRUTAL. Jak 2 in particular, if you died you'd have to restart like 20% of the game sometimes. It was rage-inducing, but the games were still awesome. Same goes for POP.
  10. Well jeez I too much prefer the later two games but I by no means dislikes SOT. I think it's a solid game, and while I can somewhat relate to what you said about the game's flaws, I never really got frustrated with it. Yeah the combat is less robust than WW and T2T, but it's the first game in the series so I'd expect nothing more. You say you find the rewinding limit infuriating but that's nothing in comparison to how cumbersome some of the trophies for WW and T2T are. Difficulty trophies don't stack, so you have to beat the games three different times. There are missable trophies relating to collectibles and life upgrades, and you have to beat both games without dying. If you ask me, that's much more annoying than the SOT Platinum. I think since you liked the darker tone of the other two games so much you're having a hard time adjusting to this one. Totally agree SOT was way ahead of its time. Beautiful soundtrack, scenery, and parkour made it a sensation. Thing is as much as I like SOT, I'll always prefer the darker tones of WW and T2T (which most people don't agree with).
  11. Yup, that did it. Thanks!