GoDBoss173

Premium Member
 PSN Profile
  • Content count

    145
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by GoDBoss173

  1. I agree with you for the most part, with one exception: AC: Blackflag. The game's story/characters were the last ones I enjoyed and really cared about in an ubisoft game. I also loved the ship parts, which surprised me back then because I hated those ship missions in AC3. At first I didnt even plan to buy it. IMO, blackflag is the best/most fun game in the series but not the best AC ( AC2, Brotherhood) because it is a pirate game.
  2. It got top ratings because most reviewers played on pc and it is a great game without those technical issues (on pc). Unity was a mediocre game AND had problems on pc as well, not just on console. I will wait for the real Ps5 version and play it with good graphics, 60 fps and when most of the bugs are fixed. I rather have a great game with bugs and technical issues at release ( I can guarantee you the problems will be fixed in 6-7 months, at least on ps5) than a mediocre game without bugs and technical issues. This game will be great in a few months, a mediocre game will always be mediocre. Of course it sucks for those people who bought the game at release. Releasing the game in this state (Ps4/X1) is outrageous and it is impossible to defend the developers.
  3. Now I finally understand why every game ( even the top notch ones) has all those " the game is overrrated/ mediocre, I am disappointed " threads and comments. If something like this (nitpicking at its finest and it is not even an objective "flaw") turns a very good game into a mediocre one, then some people shouldnt be allowed to have an opinion because it is beyond ridiculous. Thats why many player reviews are just as worthless as professional ones. Whats next? "Oh I dont like the colour of the HUD even though the rest of the game is great" ->5/10. Wtf.
  4. Then they should start playing real games because they are just proving the opposite. Personally I dont care how some random people spent their time and money but all those 95% rarity "games" are affecting the community as a whole nowadays. Do you think Sonys " trophies must be obtainable for everyone" approach is a coincidence? Definitely not, now all sony exclusives have participation platinums. It is a shame because they were never hard to begin with, but at least they required some effort. There was a time when 100 platinum trophies were an impressive feat, now everyone can get 250 plats in less than 200 hours. I can see why people, who are refusing to sell their gamer soul, lose motivation to hunt trophies, at least those who care about rankings. I am just really happy that I never cared about that stuff.
  5. Maybe you should play the game yourself before spreading lies. The art style is very similar, as well as some enemy designs and the glider. Thats it with the similarities. The rest/most of the game is (completely) different, especially the combat which is quite a bit better and more interesting than BotW by the way. If genshin impact had a different art design then nobody would associate this game with BotW. I really like BotW but it wasnt the first game that used that kind of art style, so I guess the game is also a rip off. It is a bit like saying that god of war (2018) is a rip off of the last of us, ridiculous. Edit. I just saw your signature. A "Nintendo fanboy", huh. Well, I guess that explains everything.
  6. Barbara, mona and Fischl, now I got a mission with a guaranteed xiangling ( requires adventure rank 20). I found a character tier list ( power/usefulness) https://genshin.gg/tier-list I have the two strongest water characters ( mona, barbara), the strongest lightning ( fischl) and with xiang the second strongest fire. (soon) 5 star characters arent really necessary, strong weapons are more important. I got strong 4 star weapons for the MC, fischl and barbara. So I just need a strong 4 star spear for xiang and maybe a strong ice user (chongyun) and I am ready to go. MC (wind, support/dps dealer) Xiang ( fire, dps dealer), fischl (lightning, support) and barbara (water, healer) seem pretty good. I hope I get chongyun, otherwise I will just use kaeya as my ice user ( he is not half bad)
  7. The trilogy contains DR 1 2 reload and DR V3, so two trophy lists in total which means that DR1 and DR2 share one trophy list.
  8. My personal problem with part 2 wasnt necessarily the story or the characters. Yes I think they are considerably weaker than part 1 but nowhere near as bad as certain people claim. Personally I would give it a 7/10 while story/characters in part 1 were a 9/10 or 9.5/10 for me. My biggest problem was the horrible pacing, abbys section was just too long and a rather big part of the game kinda felt like filler. Gameplay is good ( but gets a bit repetitive because the game is so fucking long) but level design, sound and graphics are definitely a 10/10. It is a bit hard to give it a score but I think part 2 is somewhere between 7.5/10 and 8/10.
  9. Are you talking about the classic edition or the game in general? I think the game itself is still pretty decent even for 2020 standards but the Ps4 version is awful. Like you said the graphics are pretty much the same but for some reason, the framerate is worse than the original. The input delay/lag is (much) worse too, probably the worst port I have ever played. I started the Ps3 version and the gameplay of the Ps4 version is rather bad in comparison. What a shame, this port ruins FC3s reputation.
  10. I meant kill him and not torture him. I wouldnt torture him either, I would make it quick and shoot him in the head. However most people wouldnt forgive joel in abbys case. They wouldnt torture him but definitely kill him, especially in a world like the last of us where you can kill without going to jail.
  11. Yeah most people would do the same thing ( kill joel) in her situation but most people would have done the same thing joel did in part 1 ( save the daughter) too. "Abby and her friends only went after Joel where as Ellie murdered everyone of Abbys friends" What a joke, they planned to catch an innocent jackson citizen and torture him to get information about joel. They were just lucky that joel was stupid enough to get in such a situation, so doing that wasnt necessary anymore. They "only went after joel" because he was the only culprit, he didnt have any help in the hospital. Abbys friend were part of joels murder and they helped her, they were accomplices. So killing them is understandable and Abby attacked tommy and jessy ( didnt kill one of her friends) too. That said most of those kills ( except nora) were self-defence. For example, Jordan was about to kill dina. There was a high chance that she wouldnt have killed mel and owen ( she even said she doesnt care about them), she just wanted abbys location. Owen tried to grab ellies weapon and was killed during the struggle. As a result ellie was attacked by mel and killed her in self defence, she didnt even know that she was pregnant. When she found out, she was shocked. Abby on the other hand knew that dina was pregnant and didnt give a shit. If not for levs interference she would have killed dina and ellie without a second thought, so dont give me the " she spared them" BS, she didnt spare them at her own will. Ellie didnt spare her at her own will either ( was influenced by joel). Killing the dog was a life or death situation, if she hadnt killed the dog, she would have been killed by the dog or the alarmed soldiers. I love dogs/animals but I would have killed him too. Ellie and abby are almost 1:1 the same, thats the whole point about this story. The only thing I can blame ellie for is the fact that she chose revenge and not family at the end of the game.
  12. NBA2K20 isnt just an ordinary sports game, it is pretty much a gambling/casino simulator which makes that choice even worse.
  13. If the quality of the story and cast is berseria/vesperia level then it will be a very good game. If it turns out to be zesteria level, uff.
  14. She would have killed the pregnant dina and ellie if Lev hadnt stopped her. At least, ellie didnt know that mel was pregnant, so you cant blame her for that. That said, Abby never spared tommy at all, she went for the kill and thought he was dead ( like we all thought). You dont need to give her more credit than she deserves, she and ellie are pretty much 1:1 the same, thats pretty much the point of the whole story.They were both influenced by a third party ( lev and joel via flashback), otherwise they would have killed each other without a second thought. About the damage toll: You forget that the fireflies started the whole conflict, not joel. They tried to kill a girl without her consent and they simply have no right to do that, no matter the reason. Joels decision is just as understandable as abbys/ellies. If they had given ellie back, they wouldnt have died. Both sides decided to kill each other and used violence to achieve their goals, joel just happened to win. It is really baffling how some people act like the fireflies were those innocent guys who got killed for no reason. The fireflies were killed by a single person, while joel was killed by a whole group. Of course ellie has more enemies to kill. "Alice best dog ever" To be fair she was attacked by the dog.She had two choices: getting hurt/killed by the dog or kill him. I love dogs but I wouldnt die to save a dog I have no connection with either.
  15. I agree, it makes sense that abby wants revenge.I would probably do the same, at least without the context regarding joels reasons/situation. While I agree that some people are whining the whole time about minor stuff , I can still understand why some people dont like this game. Not all people are haters. Personally I am pretty neutral here even though I have to admit that I am 100% team joel (for different reasons). I dont think the game is trash but I dont think it is a 10/10 either. Solid gameplay and top-notch graphics, audio and level design. On the other hand it is not a surprise that the story is very divisive and offers enough fair reasons for people to dislike it/not enjoy it. That said, I think the story is fine but nothing amazing and I highly prefer tlou1's story.
  16. Back then nobody knew what ellie really wanted. Thats the problem, they tried to kill her without even asking her (neither the fireflies nor joel knew her intentions/thoughts). The fireflies simply didnt have the right to just kill her, no matter the reason. There wasnt even a guarantee for success, it was nothing more than a small chance and they wasted more than enough lives in the past. Joel choose his "daughter", a decision 99% of humanity would make in his situation and with his background, yes including guys like you. Hell even abbys dad would have done the same thing. His reaction to marlenes question made it pretty clear that he wouldnt sacrifice his daughter. The fireflies started the whole conflict, joel wanted the kid back and nothing else .If they hadnt tried to stop him by force, they would still be alive, thats a fact. It was a fight with ellie as the "prize" and joel happened to win.
  17. Most of them are hypcrites who would do the same thing. (trying to get the daughter back) I quote myself: "Lets be honest 95% of humanity ( even those criticizing joel) would do the same thing in joels situation, especially with his background. It was humanity who killed his real daughter and gave him a severe 20 years long depression and know you expect him to sacrifice his new light for a CHANCE to save a world full of rapists and psychopaths? The interesting thing about it is that pretty much everyone would choose like joel because it is "perfectly human" even though we all know that it is selfish and "wrong" ( If you think about it rationally without any shred of feelings and emotions) " Hell they didnt even ask ellie and abbys father is a pathetic hypocrite who pressured marlene into accepting the operation. His reaction to marlenes question made it pretty clear that he wouldnt do the same thing with abby.
  18. Imo the enjoyment you have with tlou1's gameplay depends on the difficulty. On normal or lower it doesnt feel like a survival game ( way to much health, ressources and ammo), as a result it feels like a mediocre action game. It is much better on survival ( IMO the perfect difficulty).
  19. By that logic, Joel didnt kill a single firefly in cold blood either. He never wanted to kill them for the sake of killing but they basically kidnapped ellie and were trying to kill her. He tried to get ellie back and the fireflies tried to stop him by all means necessary.What do you expect from joel? Let himself killed? The fireflies started the whole thing, not joel. The fireflies were the first villains, followed by joel, followed by abby and finally ellie. Joels reason is just as strong as abbys, so how the hell is he "worse" than abby? The difference is that there were no "outsiders" in abbys way who protected joel. What do you think would have happened if they found joel with 10 other jackson soldiers somewhere outside the town? They would have attacked them and killed them to get joel. Calling abby a hero, what a joke. The whole franchise never had a hero in the first place. "we played the game from the point of view of Abby first, I think we'd all agree she's the hero. " If joel is a random criminal and killed all those fireflies for no reason, yes. We all know thats not the case. Joels reason is just as strong as abbys.
  20. Abby is neither the hero nor the villain. It wasnt abby who convinced the group to spare the innocent ellie and tommy, it was owen ( the only decent guy of that group). Her reason for killing joel is understandable but also ellies reason to kill abby and her group. Just like joels reason to save ellie in part 1. Lets be honest 95% of humanity ( even those criticizing joel) would do the same thing in joels situation, especially with his background. It was humanity who killed his real daughter and gave him a severe 20 years long depression and know you expect him to sacrifice his new light for a CHANCE to save a world full of rapists and psychopaths? The interesting thing about it is that pretty much everyone would choose like joel because it is "perfectly human" even though we all know that it is selfish and "wrong" ( If you think about it rationally without any shred of feelings and emotions) Theoretically all fractions are villains ( fireflies, joel, abby, ellie). The fireflies started it by killing a girl without even asking her and threatening joel. Abbys father was a hypocritical piece of shit by the way. I agree that ellie should have stopped after her encounter with abby and stay with dina and the child. "after that she doesn't kill anyone in cold blood. " She would have killed the pregnant dina if the kid didnt stop her.
  21. User ratings, especially on metacritic, are just as useless as professional reviews nowadays. Way too many trolls and idiots giving 0-3/10 scores for stupid reasons. TloU2 will have a rather poor score on metacritic ( probably around 6.5-7.0), independent from game quality. The whole discussion about working conditions, false (text) spoilers and sjw propaganda will result in tons of 0-2/10 scores.
  22. I did so I am not 100% sure. I think it is enough to unlock them. Save the game and build every necessary building to have all monuments unlocked at the same time. Dont try to build all the monuments for now. Oh and I have something else, as far as I remember there are certain maps ( european ones) where you cant unlock all buildings, I played on the black forest map so I never had that problem but maybe you are playing on one of those maps. Black forest map was the only map I played on and I unlocked every building (including monuments) except eiffel tower, arc de triomphe and a few dlc buildings (sphinx)
  23. Did you unlock all the monuments?
  24. Your original comment was, I quote: "People think UC4 is a good game, uh. " That was the comment my original post was refering to. When I said that such an opinion is worthless ( which it is) without any explanation, you lashed out. The first time you mentioned U2 was AFTER my post when you said that U2 was the peak and the U3/U4 were weaker. "without acknowledging UC2 was the basis for my opinion on UC4" So thinking that U2 > U4 automatically means that U4 isnt a good game? What kind of logic is that? Well I was right, what a waste of time. Lets just drop it.
  25. Why should I? I never said that U4 is better than U2, IMO U2 is the best game of the series. You wrote that U4 is a bad game without ANY reasoning or explanation. That IS a worthless opinion, nobody expected a five page essay. The moment someone disagreed or called you out, you replied with stuff like: "t. person with literal brain damage. " "So get the fuck out of my face with your zoomer Chinese cartoon bullshit. " Of course thats not a conversation, it is kindergarten. So explain to me how calling you an aggressive clown (sorry but you act like one) is even close to the stuff you wrote but of course I am the aggressive guy losing his shit. You are quite a delusional hypocrite living in your own dream world, arent you?You have proven pretty much all my points, thanks for that.