zafira1290 Posted April 16, 2014 Share Posted April 16, 2014 topic says it all! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
skateak Posted April 16, 2014 Share Posted April 16, 2014 I would say so. I have the WAW plat but couldn't beat COD Classic on veteran. No heath packs and it only takes 1-3 shots to kill you. Matters what gun they have. WAW is only hard because grenade spam. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
willmill97 Posted April 16, 2014 Share Posted April 16, 2014 Absofuckinglutely! 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HcG Clawz Posted April 16, 2014 Share Posted April 16, 2014 I dont really know i ragequited with both games but i got further with cod classics i gotta pick uhm both games again i think i dont think cod classic is that hard you just need alot of patience and a little bit of luck sometimes Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MrManBuz Posted May 28, 2014 Share Posted May 28, 2014 I'm not sure if it's harder because it's been so long since I played WaW but CoD classic is definitely more frustrating. At least with WaW it's consistent, you know you're going to get spammed with grenades, in CoD classic you go around a corner (Or even lean out) and you can get shot instantly and die, next time you do it you won't, it's horribly inconsistent adding randomness which in turn creates BS deaths which that in turn leads to a LOT of frustration and rage, mix that with a downright awful checkpoint system and you've got yourself a rage inducing concoction. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
danielc655 Posted May 28, 2014 Share Posted May 28, 2014 If COD classic were to go on sale I would probably give veteran another try but from what I can remember it's a pain in the ass. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MrManBuz Posted May 28, 2014 Share Posted May 28, 2014 If COD classic were to go on sale I would probably give veteran another try but from what I can remember it's a pain in the ass. It is, but it's definitely doable. It's just about taking your time and trying to not let the BS deaths like I mentioned get to you. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
danielc655 Posted May 28, 2014 Share Posted May 28, 2014 It is, but it's definitely doable. It's just about taking your time and trying to not let the BS deaths like I mentioned get to you. Just the same as Medal of Honor: Frontline on Hard. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Light_Infinite_ Posted July 7, 2014 Share Posted July 7, 2014 no ,world at war was more hard due to it ridiculously grenade spam and crazy enemy aim , call of duty was hard in the level dam and the house with Germans playing full house in that dam building Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
spetsdaddy62 Posted August 2, 2014 Share Posted August 2, 2014 To be honest, I really don't care it its harder than world at war. I used to play a lot of classic games when I had my ps2 to 2007, so I really wouldn't mind playing a hard classic game. Its actually fun. I want to get call of duty classic, too bad I don't have the money right now. Anyone know how much it cost? Because I might want to get platinum for that game. *if Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KingCuervo88 Posted August 2, 2014 Share Posted August 2, 2014 i like going back to the classic COD but...... FUCK VETERAN....shit checkpoints and bullshit deaths... it can eat poo poo Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chefiroth Posted August 2, 2014 Share Posted August 2, 2014 Classic is way harder because its merely luck & no health packs, plus if you have low health as is some checkpoints might not happen. I also thought MoH Frontoine was harder than W@W too. W@W had health regen, & the grenade spams were usually only horrid on three missions 'Relentless', 'Blowtorch & Corkscrew' & the last one Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kubanga Posted November 18, 2014 Share Posted November 18, 2014 (edited) Waw was hard on vet because of the bullshit mix of precise enemy aiming, slow health regeneration, infinite spawns, bad friendly ai, grenade spam, infinite spawning enemies oh yeah did I mention they spam u with more grenades then ww2 produced? Cod Classic is hard because of the health bar, aggressive enemies, solo missions, no med packs, bad graphics, terrible hit boxes, no sprint button, awful animations, bad controls, and a insane amount of enemies Edited November 29, 2014 by Kubanga 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
maurjen Posted December 27, 2014 Share Posted December 27, 2014 Both has its fair share on being painful and have their own advantage in comparison Call of duty Classic - No health pack - Little checkpoint if health are low - AI in some missions are useless Call of duty world at war - Grenade spasm - Unlimited enemies in most levels - Cannot remain in one place for long Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Boots_12345 Posted December 31, 2014 Share Posted December 31, 2014 World at war was an awesome game back in the day, I managed to plat the game in like 5 months. World at war was a challenge, some levels I had to do over again a few times, but I still got the plat. The trophy I had trouble the most was Sum of All Zeros but I managed to get it. I'm willing to give CoD Classic a try sometime soon. Very soon. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MaceMP4-2Iron Posted March 14, 2015 Share Posted March 14, 2015 my opignion is the Classic is not hard for me beceause i still have my old version on this games (PC) and i beat the veteran mode in pc and ps3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now