x9zachattack5x Posted August 19, 2014 Share Posted August 19, 2014 Maps are small and there are only 3 classes and each class only has 3 weapons. Does it get better in Warfighter? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BlindMango Posted August 19, 2014 Share Posted August 19, 2014 Maps are small and there are only 3 classes and each class only has 3 weapons. Does it get better in Warfighter? It gets worse in Warfighter, lol - MOH 2010 was at least somewhat enjoyable, Warfighter multiplayer is just bad, really bad... The single player is okay though, lol 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
x9zachattack5x Posted August 19, 2014 Author Share Posted August 19, 2014 It gets worse in Warfighter, lol - MOH 2010 was at least somewhat enjoyable, Warfighter multiplayer is just bad, really bad... The single player is okay though, lol Lol yeah MoH 2010 isnt that bad. I just ate a rpg rocket though Went through my face. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DanielVT Posted August 19, 2014 Share Posted August 19, 2014 Maps are small and there are only 3 classes and each class only has 3 weapons. Does it get better in Warfighter? I seem to be one of the few that loved Medal of Honor and its MP, and enjoyed Warfighter's even more. I to this day don't understand why people dislike Warfighter. The campaign was super average, but the MP was a blast to me. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SIR_Ozzy_86 Posted August 19, 2014 Share Posted August 19, 2014 It gets worse in Warfighter, lol - MOH 2010 was at least somewhat enjoyable, Warfighter multiplayer is just bad, really bad... The single player is okay though, lol The Campaign for Warfighter wasn't "ok'.. it has one of the best first Campaigns. I actually played the campaign over again after getting all the campaign trophies. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bry142 Posted August 19, 2014 Share Posted August 19, 2014 I enjoyed the multiplayer more in warfighter more I am not sure why. The campaign was good in medal of honor (2010) while warfighter's campaign was pretty disappointing. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BlindMango Posted August 19, 2014 Share Posted August 19, 2014 (edited) The Campaign for Warfighter wasn't "ok'.. it has one of the best first Campaigns. I actually played the campaign over again after getting all the campaign trophies. I mean, I can see what they were trying to do with the story. To me it had a good goal but didn't deliver as well as they kept saying it would. It had its shining moments, but in the end the overall experience was "okay" or "good" to me, but nothing mind-blowing or truly fantastic. It didn't really set the bar so to speak in my opinion. As far as the multiplayer and what all of you are saying about it, I honestly had more fun with MOH 2010, it felt more grounded and polished. Warfighter felt like this early bad PS2 game, graphically, gameplay-wise, etc... Half the multiplayer trophies are glitched and don't unlock for people (I've tried two weeks ago yet again to get one of them with no luck). I don't know, it just felt broken all over, like I was playing a beta or something and they didn't totally connect all the dots yet. Additionally, only about 20 - 30 people play at one single time now, which means only one (maybe two or three) servers are open at once and require you to buy the Dark Zero Thirty map packs if you want to stay playing in those servers for an extended amount of time. Edited August 19, 2014 by BlindMango Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now