RuinousOne25 Posted March 22, 2015 Share Posted March 22, 2015 I remember when I heard this game I was hoping it would go back to how a Crack in Time played with how it played and all, but when I played it, It was too similar to All for One and Full Frontal Assualt with how everything played, not to mention there was only 5 planets to visit in the game which was really disappointing, so guys, what do you all think of the series now? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
UndreyVITA Posted March 22, 2015 Share Posted March 22, 2015 (edited) This was supposed to be a smaller game. And it was still really, really fun. The series hasn't jumped the shark, and they're working had on a remake for the PS4. Edited March 22, 2015 by UndreyVITA Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
itzzh3lixx Posted March 22, 2015 Share Posted March 22, 2015 Nope, the game was awesome and just as fun as the original trilogy, got big hopes for the PS4 game Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PSNP is crap i left Posted March 22, 2015 Share Posted March 22, 2015 I still think it's a good RaC game. It's not worse than A4O & FFA but not better than the original R&C Trilogy, it's just average and i still think the series is going strong what with the PS4 game coming out sometime this year. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MMDE Posted March 22, 2015 Share Posted March 22, 2015 (edited) I too think this was a good R&C game, but it's very short. It does have most of the classic stuff, and they do introduce that new weapon or something, but again, very very short. Edited March 22, 2015 by MMDE 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BeautifulTorment Posted March 22, 2015 Share Posted March 22, 2015 Solid game all round. I don't mind that it was shorter than normal. R&C has not started declining yet. A shining star in a world of reboots and franchise-milking. 4 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wildstwawberries Posted March 22, 2015 Share Posted March 22, 2015 If it tells you that its going to be a short game it can't be counted as a flaw. Especially for the small price 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Senor_T_Dub Posted March 22, 2015 Share Posted March 22, 2015 If it tells you that its going to be a short game it can't be counted as a flaw. Especially for the small price Agreed. While it's by no means a great game, it was fun while it lasted. The original trilogy was good, but I think the two Future games on PS3 were the best. Wish Tools of Destruction got a trophy patch. 4 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
limelight1979 Posted March 22, 2015 Share Posted March 22, 2015 Im pretty sure the OP doesnt really know what "jump the shark" means. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wildstwawberries Posted March 22, 2015 Share Posted March 22, 2015 Agreed. While it's by no means a great game, it was fun while it lasted. The original trilogy was good, but I think the two Future games on PS3 were the best. Wish Tools of Destruction got a trophy patch. totally agree. FFA is fun too but not a good R+C game Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dragon-Archon Posted March 23, 2015 Share Posted March 23, 2015 While I wish the game was longer, it was very fun and definitely worth it. R&C Into The Nexus finally returned to the roots of the series after trying something different with A4O and FFA. 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sigma999 Posted October 31, 2015 Share Posted October 31, 2015 Hope this game lives up to my expectations .Be as good or at least as fun asthr original trilogy. For some reason i didn't enjoy Crack in Time that much and didn't had the bother to replay the game all together like i usually do in R&C games (only the trilogy tho). Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Auto-Tomato Posted October 31, 2015 Share Posted October 31, 2015 If anything Nexus went back to it's roots, AfO & FFA might be accused of jumping the shark in a roundabout way however... Nexus was short but old school R&C, the other two tried something different, they were decent but not quite the R&C games we all loved. Are IG running out of ideas? Re-imagining/rebooting the franchise for PS4 might give credence to that idea but from what I've seen it looks like a good decision. I'm presuming R&C will be a big hit when it releases, I know many an R&C fan that will be buying it day one, myself included, but what Insomniac do thereafter will be very interesting...are they going to redo the best of the franchise? The original trilogy through the Future series? Will they give us the original then jump to something completely new? I think I'd prefer the latter tbh, but whatever they have planned I'm sure it will be good. Given there's been 12 games in 13 years (I think) prior to the PS4 iteration, I think IG have done a pretty good job of keeping the games fun and interesting, and even the novelty games were pretty well done... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AegisAvenger Posted November 10, 2015 Share Posted November 10, 2015 (edited) As everyone said, this play like the real R&C, nothing like A4O or FFA. It is a shame it is so short but for how much it cost, it's good enough. Edited November 11, 2015 by HiryuMK Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SuperSaiyan3985 Posted February 9, 2017 Share Posted February 9, 2017 I liked this game, it was pretty solid. I mean they bothered to add a sick RYNO so there's that! LOL No but seriously, back in the PS3 days after ACIT, Insomniac really twisted the series. It went from being singleplayer and story focused to crappy online and co-op based. I'm talking about games like AFO and FFA. Those games were so pointless, however ITN was a big step in putting the franchise back on track. Now look where we are with the PS4 reboot! On 3/22/2015 at 6:20 PM, Oblivion said: I still think it's a good RaC game. It's not worse than A4O & FFA but not better than the original R&C Trilogy, it's just average and i still think the series is going strong what with the PS4 game coming out sometime this year. I highly disagree. The PS2 trilogy was more packed, with a more polished story and more quests to complete overall. They were just bigger and better games. On 3/22/2015 at 7:10 PM, EpicTrollBlox said: If it tells you that its going to be a short game it can't be counted as a flaw. Especially for the small price On 3/22/2015 at 7:10 PM, EpicTrollBlox said: If it tells you that its going to be a short game it can't be counted as a flaw. Especially for the small price True, as long as a game is price appropriately for its replay value I have no problem with "shorter games". Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LeSikhism Posted August 3, 2023 Share Posted August 3, 2023 This game is dog shit, honestly I do love ratchet series but this game sucks, while I was playing this I realized that this game runs in a unstable 30 fps mess, bad illumination, the combat system is trash, 5 fucking planets to travel on like what the hell is going on???. This is the worst ratchet and clank I ever played in my life Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now