Killah184 Posted March 18, 2016 Share Posted March 18, 2016 I'd settle for a remaster. Hell, I'd settle for a an untouched port. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Swordsman83 Posted March 18, 2016 Share Posted March 18, 2016 more mp trophies on the way. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ShadowStar83x Posted March 29, 2016 Author Share Posted March 29, 2016 (edited) Well, until E3 is over, I refuse to give up hope! Might be wishful thinking on my part, but it's either that or try in vain to get interested in VR. Edited March 29, 2016 by ShadowStar83x Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ITALUKE Posted December 24, 2022 Share Posted December 24, 2022 I know this thread is old and will probably get closed after my reply, but man I couldn't avoid to ask why was the name Red dead redemption 2 so ugly in your eyes guys? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wltrsjcwvita Posted December 24, 2022 Share Posted December 24, 2022 4 minutes ago, ITALUKE said: I know this thread is old and will probably get closed after my reply, but man I couldn't avoid to ask why was the name Red dead redemption 2 so ugly in your eyes guys? I've never played the games myself, but my guess is that the series went: Red Dead Revolver Red Dead Redemption Red Dead Redemption 2 I think people were probably expecting a different name, although from what I understand, RDR2 does have direct ties to RDR1, so it does make more sense as a sequel. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MonaSaxPayne Posted December 24, 2022 Share Posted December 24, 2022 42 minutes ago, wltrsjcwvita said: I think people were probably expecting a different name, although from what I understand, RDR2 does have direct ties to RDR1, so it does make more sense as a sequel. RDR2 is actually the prequel to RDR 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jgm4789 Posted December 24, 2022 Share Posted December 24, 2022 Because its the third game and at the time people expected it to be called red dead rebellion, red dead revengeance, or some other word starting with r. Calling it redemption 2 made sense as the stories are definitely connected but i can see them making a game with the name revolver 2 or something else if they decide to go backward in the timeline back to reds era(as redemption pretty much takes place at the end of the wild west era and going any further would just make it a roaring 20s or great depression era gta) but calling the next game redemption 3 would only make sense if its during john marston or arthur morgans era.Its sort of like how the tales series usually uses a different word each game but isn't against numbered sequels when theyre directly connected. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sunny Posted December 24, 2022 Share Posted December 24, 2022 Hate when I see a new post thinking it's a new game but it's just necro threading, solely my fault for jumping to conclusions but got my hopes up... 4 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wltrsjcwvita Posted December 24, 2022 Share Posted December 24, 2022 1 hour ago, MonaSaxPayne said: RDR2 is actually the prequel to RDR Makes sense, I knew there was some sort of connection. I guess Red Dead Redemption 0 would've been a better name lol 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now