Gibbo_0113 Posted June 14, 2016 Share Posted June 14, 2016 So much back and forth, and we're still no closer to agreeing on whether "RDR2" is a sequel to Revolver or Redemption. I'm personally hoping for Revolver as I think continuing Redemption's story would undermine the first game's ending. I myself am hoping for an entirely new story which Rockstar mostly do. It cant be a sequel to Redemption for obvious reasons and nobody likes Jack Lets just wait for Rockstar to announce this highly anticipated game . I wanna throw some more people onto the train tracks . Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MMDE Posted June 14, 2016 Share Posted June 14, 2016 (edited) What are you two talking about haha. Certainly doesn't sound like Red Dead discussion. Maybe better to continue it in a PM perhaps? I agree. That "leaked" map looks way to colorful. I could make a map myself and say its the new Red Dead map But i do think we will be able to swim this time. We were talking about the topic actually! Which isn't RDR as much as why RDR wasn't shown. Edited June 14, 2016 by MMDE 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gibbo_0113 Posted June 14, 2016 Share Posted June 14, 2016 (edited) We were talking about the topic actually! Which isn't RDR as much as why RDR wasn't shown. Fair enough. I just saw a lot of talk about shootings and ISIS and the FBI and thought what the hell is going on I don't think ISIS and the FBI would be in a Red Dead game Edited June 15, 2016 by Gibbo_0113 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MMDE Posted June 14, 2016 Share Posted June 14, 2016 So much back and forth, and we're still no closer to agreeing on whether "RDR2" is a sequel to Revolver or Redemption. I'm personally hoping for Revolver as I think continuing Redemption's story would undermine the first game's ending. What people have been speculating about is prequel to Redemption. His life with the gang. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Snokes Posted June 14, 2016 Share Posted June 14, 2016 What people have been speculating about is prequel to Redemption. His life with the gang. I'm going to interpret that as a statement that I need to make it a bit more obvious when I'm not being serious. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gibbo_0113 Posted June 14, 2016 Share Posted June 14, 2016 What people have been speculating about is prequel to Redemption. His life with the gang. There was also a "leak" for Red Dead Rebellion almost 4 years ago said to be set 10 years before Red Dead Revolver and have a protagonist called Big Jesse. There are so many supposed "leaks" (trolls) we should just ignore them until Rockstar gives the official word. Some "leaks" actually turn out to be true i cant deny that, but thats only a small percentage. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
damon8r351 Posted June 14, 2016 Share Posted June 14, 2016 well yeah you do when you want to ban offensive speech. You really don't have freedom of speech when you don't have the freedom to offend. Now do you? Especially when certain groups are exempt. I'm past all the SJW nonsense due to lack of interest on my part. Because what diverted my interest now is what you conveniently haven't resolved: Where it is that you saw that the FBI's investigation was dropped because the playing of the "Muslim card". And you won't and you're going to continue to snowjob me on that front because one of three possibilities: Your source isn't a credible news source Your source is an opinion piece Your source doesn't exist You should be jumping at the bit to prove me wrong and produce that source just to rub it in my face. So produce it and prove me wrong. Don't spout of nonsense about sanctuary cities and federal lawsuits on states protecting their borders, because I know all that too. I watch Fox News opinion pieces while I'm at the gym in the mornings too, and not of my own volition. Produce a credible link that supports your claim. Hell, produce any link. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Daniel_Shadow170 Posted June 14, 2016 Author Share Posted June 14, 2016 Holy shit. I wouldn't of made the topic if all that was going to be posted. 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
XX_FTW Posted June 14, 2016 Share Posted June 14, 2016 On topic, this doesn't fit Rockstar's MO. GTAV was announced out of nowhere on their website. It doesn't seem like something they would do as the reveal. Now, for those saying that if this rumor is true (which, again, I don't think so) why pull it? It is not weakness to show sensitivity. It is also just good business sense to distance your product from tragedy. See: Motorstorm Apocalypse. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mournblade05143 Posted June 14, 2016 Share Posted June 14, 2016 I'm past all the SJW nonsense due to lack of interest on my part. Because what diverted my interest now is what you conveniently haven't resolved: Where it is that you saw that the FBI's investigation was dropped because the playing of the "Muslim card". And you won't and you're going to continue to snowjob me on that front because one of three possibilities: Your source isn't a credible news source Your source is an opinion piece Your source doesn't exist You should be jumping at the bit to prove me wrong and produce that source just to rub it in my face. So produce it and prove me wrong. Don't spout of nonsense about sanctuary cities and federal lawsuits on states protecting their borders, because I know all that too. I watch Fox News opinion pieces while I'm at the gym in the mornings too, and not of my own volition. Produce a credible link that supports your claim. Hell, produce any link. Bye. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ShadowStar83x Posted June 15, 2016 Share Posted June 15, 2016 Sony's VP of third party relations has denied they changed anything at the last minute. http://www.ign.com/articles/2016/06/15/e3-2016-content-from-sony-press-conference-has-been-locked-and-unchanged-for-months 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dani061094 Posted June 15, 2016 Share Posted June 15, 2016 If this is true then I would expect Red Dead 3 to be unveiled quite soon. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lance_87 Posted June 15, 2016 Share Posted June 15, 2016 Someone in this thread needs to get a life and that's definitely not me. Sheesh. On topic, this doesn't fit Rockstar's MO. GTAV was announced out of nowhere on their website. It doesn't seem like something they would do as the reveal. Now, for those saying that if this rumor is true (which, again, I don't think so) why pull it? It is not weakness to show sensitivity. It is also just good business sense to distance your product from tragedy. See: Motorstorm Apocalypse. They didn't announce GTAV on E3, correct, but that was only valid for the old-gen version... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hore Posted June 16, 2016 Share Posted June 16, 2016 (edited) >accuses OP of making a baity thread >takes the bait anyway, arguing for 5+ pages Heh. At least he's self-aware. I only have this 1 post to contribute to this thread: Regarding the rumour, it's just stupid enough to be believable. It's ridiculous that events like these indirectly impose censorship on companies like R* just because of one incident. It's comparable to childhood in a way, how "one bad apple ruins it for everyone", where 1 kid fucks up and everyone gets punished as a result. The best thing we can do is move on with our lives; by censoring ourselves we're giving them the attention they seek and thus letting them win. A similar incident happened near 9/11 with R* removing flyable planes from GTA 3 in light of the recent tragedy. That's a prime example of "letting them win". We sacrificed our entertainment experience for the sake of being PC. Like I said, there's this expected censorship from society when these things happen, otherwise you're an insensitive monster. Another key issue with censorship in light of tragedies is figuring out where to draw the line. Let's assume the trailer was in fact deferred for the sake of being PC. Would it have been deferred if only 30 people were killed? 20 people? 10? What if only a few were killed, or even just 1? Well that kind of stuff happens all the time and nobody bats an eye. The reality is that there's no set number of casualties for a tragedy to be deemed significant enough to warrant public panic & thus subsequent censorship. Doesn't every case of homicide, regardless of victim quantity, deserve equal respect towards the victim(s) and their families? If you agree, then it's hypocritical of you to support this type of expected censorship that R* gave in to with GTA 3 and supposedly gave in to with RDR. Edited June 16, 2016 by GIONAScm2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
XX_FTW Posted June 16, 2016 Share Posted June 16, 2016 http://www.ign.com/articles/2016/06/15/e3-2016-content-from-sony-press-conference-has-been-locked-and-unchanged-for-months Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MMDE Posted June 16, 2016 Share Posted June 16, 2016 http://www.ign.com/articles/2016/06/15/e3-2016-content-from-sony-press-conference-has-been-locked-and-unchanged-for-months You really think the content was locked down months before? =P Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mattveego Posted June 16, 2016 Share Posted June 16, 2016 (edited) This is 100% false for so many reasons 1. Rockstar doesn't do E3. They are the biggest developer on the planet, the next Red Dead will (once again) break sales records for them. They don't need E3 to reveal their game, they can do it on their own. If I remember correctly Rockstar decided to just drop the logo one day for GTAV and the whole internet went insane. 2. Why would Sony end their show with a third party game? I can't remember this ever happening. They always end with a new and upcoming title (Twisted Metal, The Last of Us, Uncharted 4, etc.) or something to do with upcoming hardware. It would make 0 sense to end a SONY conference with something that isn't completely Sony. 3. You really think they wouldn't have time to just edit out the one offensive part? Come on I think it is way waaaayyyy more likely that the PS4 Neo was supposed to close out the show but they realized something is wrong or they aren't ready to reveal it just yet. Edited June 16, 2016 by mattveego Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ShadowStar83x Posted June 16, 2016 Share Posted June 16, 2016 You really think the content was locked down months before? =P Maybe not, but that's their story and they're sticking to it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
XX_FTW Posted June 16, 2016 Share Posted June 16, 2016 You really think the content was locked down months before? =P Do I trust them more than random guy on the internet? Yes. Honestly, I just don't think this rumor holds water. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now