Order

[CrimsonFalzar]

So I played all of these when they came out on Ps3 and I wanted to know If I had to do them in order I kinda wanted to go 

Bioshock 2 

Infinite 

then 1

 

Because 2 is my least fav infinite is my 2nd and 1 is my fav

Or do you think it will affect me playing them with the difference in gameplay

[smellslikejavier]

i like to play my games in the way they "were meant to be played", with this i mean play them by release date. if you play a sequel first and then go back to play the first one's probably going to notice the outdated controls compared to the new installments.

 

so if i play them it will be this way: 1 -> 2 -> infinite

Edited September 28, 2016 by smellslikejavier

[CrumpetOfDojima]

I don't think it'd make a huge difference, considering you've played them before.

 

I mean, story-plot-wise. I'd go B2, B1, BI.

 

But I tend to play games as they're released, playing the prologue after the sequels (if they're released that way) are typically more fun, as you have an understanding of the ground the prologue is sitting on.

 

Just play them how you'd like, they all feel similar control wise. All look great for their times.

[Chirithy84]

Well.....

Bioshock Infinite with the two Burial at Sea Add ons after finish the Main Game

Bioshock

Bioshock 2

I am also new at the Bioshock franchise but I play it in the historical order

[Beyondthegrave07]

The one thing you'd have to be aware of is the improvements on the series over time. It's the same reason why I opt people to play the MGS series in the order of release rather than chronologically in the story. That way, it won't feel like you are going backwards in terms of mechanics and gameplay.

Though since you've already played all 3, I don't think it really matters what order you play them in.