FielVeredus Posted February 28, 2018 Share Posted February 28, 2018 (edited) pretty funny that this game featured on top game play this week of PSNprofile lol with 1,740 players $1.99 for plat can't go wrong, basically free when combine with Sony Rewards program. I bought this solely to filled my 99.98 to above 100 for spend 100 get 15 promotion. so it is good. I saved Vita version in case i need to filled that gap again on next promotion Edited February 28, 2018 by FielVeredus 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NutellaOrgies Posted February 28, 2018 Share Posted February 28, 2018 Honestly I feel like every game should have a platinum, but this game probably got it because I think you're allowed to pay Sony for putting a plat on a short game 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MMDE Posted February 28, 2018 Share Posted February 28, 2018 5 minutes ago, NutellaOrgies said: Honestly I feel like every game should have a platinum, but this game probably got it because I think you're allowed to pay Sony for putting a plat on a short game You don't pay Sony to do that. These days you can pick... that's it really. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sephiroth4424 Posted February 28, 2018 Share Posted February 28, 2018 (edited) 1 hour ago, FielVeredus said: pretty funny that this game featured on top game play this week of PSNprofile lol with 1,740 players It's even funnier when this game makes it to top 10, but the new Metal Gear doesn't.I know people hate it but still it's a game from popular series Edited February 28, 2018 by sephiroth4424 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FielVeredus Posted February 28, 2018 Share Posted February 28, 2018 Just now, sephiroth4424 said: It's even funnier when this game makes it to top 10, but the new Metal Gear doesn't.I know people hate it but still it's a game for popular series it's even more funnier that this game manage to beat Call of Duty WWII on this site lol Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sephiroth4424 Posted February 28, 2018 Share Posted February 28, 2018 1 minute ago, FielVeredus said: it's even more funnier that this game manage to beat Call of Duty WWII on this site lol That one is a few months old though Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Satoshi Ookami Posted February 28, 2018 Share Posted February 28, 2018 3 minutes ago, FielVeredus said: it's even more funnier that this game manage to beat Call of Duty WWII on this site lol Because PSNP has taste Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NutellaOrgies Posted February 28, 2018 Share Posted February 28, 2018 3 hours ago, MMDE said: You don't pay Sony to do that. These days you can pick... that's it really. I just looked up where I read that, it said it's a theory, my bad. Didn't remember seeing that last time Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
grimydawg___ Posted February 28, 2018 Share Posted February 28, 2018 I want you guys to play and finish Superman 64. Then, you can talk about trash LOL 4 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
S_y_n_e_IR_g_Y Posted February 28, 2018 Share Posted February 28, 2018 (edited) Superman 64 .. one of the worst games from agdq, but one of the funniest Runs Btw little adventure was for me a mix of orc slayer, eekeemoo and maybe my Name is mayo, just as a mobile Version ^^ Edited February 28, 2018 by S_y_n_e_IR_g_Y Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
starcrunch061 Posted February 28, 2018 Share Posted February 28, 2018 2 hours ago, grimydawg said: I want you guys to play and finish Superman 64. Then, you can talk about trash LOL That's just a difference of degree. Superman 64 wins, because the game is so long. But if Little Adventure on the Prairie was as long as Super 64, I think there would be a good contest. 5 hours ago, sephiroth4424 said: It's even funnier when this game makes it to top 10, but the new Metal Gear doesn't. That is pretty funny, actually. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
grimydawg___ Posted February 28, 2018 Share Posted February 28, 2018 46 minutes ago, starcrunch061 said: That's just a difference of degree. Superman 64 wins, because the game is so long. But if Little Adventure on the Prairie was as long as Super 64, I think there would be a good contest. That is pretty funny, actually. Then you haven't played Superman 64 LOL. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Undead Wolf Posted February 28, 2018 Share Posted February 28, 2018 I posted something in another thread which is relevant to this topic. Quote Sony are the ones who decides which games get a platinum or not. The developers of "small" titles are often told they aren't allowed a platinum trophy in their game, and since they aren't familiar with the trophy system, they accept that and move on. It's known for a fact this is what happened with the original Outlast and Metal Gear Solid: Ground Zeroes. I'm sure there are plenty of other examples. As for My Name is Mayo and all the other games of that ilk, the developers are fully aware of the trophy system and want to exploit trophy hunters for extra sales. It has been said that when Sony come to them and say their game doesn't qualify for a platinum, the developers keep pushing and pushing until Sony eventually cave in. I wish Sony stuck to their guns when it came to this, but I guess they're scared of burning bridges with the developers, causing them to stop releasing games on their platform. If by some miracle one of these games became a hit on other platforms, it wouldn't be good for them. But yeah, it's always sad to see games like this doing well. You're being played like a damn fiddle... 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Maaden_Swe Posted February 28, 2018 Share Posted February 28, 2018 On 2018-02-24 at 0:12 AM, RedSkyKing said: Are people really desperate enough to buy shit just for an easy platinum? Smh Yes, I bought it twice ? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
starcrunch061 Posted February 28, 2018 Share Posted February 28, 2018 (edited) 15 minutes ago, grimydawg said: Then you haven't played Superman 64 LOL. I own it. Edited February 28, 2018 by starcrunch061 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bullstomp Posted February 28, 2018 Share Posted February 28, 2018 21 hours ago, blendercat27 said: This game was made by a small team based in Qatar. Sony and Nintendo obviously cut them some slack to open a door for them, and that's okay. How many games from Qatar can anybody here name? They get a little exposure, a little money, a little experience, who knows what they could do? And we get a couple of super-easy plats for about the price of a good cup of coffee. Sounds like a win/win. Wow, so we are now allowing for shit to be published and sold based on the geographical origin of the studio and not the actual quality of the title? That's just stupid. I don't buy games based on where they are made and quite honestly don't know anyone who does. . . 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
starcrunch061 Posted February 28, 2018 Share Posted February 28, 2018 14 minutes ago, Undead Wolf said: I posted something in another thread which is relevant to this topic. But yeah, it's always sad to see games like this doing well. You're being played like a damn fiddle... You mention that you think Sony is afraid of "burning bridges" with developers. But is there really fear of burning the bridge with the developer of Orc Slayer? Or this game? Hell, I would think that Sony would be happy to keep dreck like this off the store, and keep other developers from trying the same crap. Further, I can't imagine that even the most indie of indie developers supports games like Little Adventure on the Prairie (to say nothing of stolen asset games like Solbrain). 21 hours ago, blendercat27 said: This game was made by a small team based in Qatar. Sony and Nintendo obviously cut them some slack to open a door for them, and that's okay. How many games from Qatar can anybody here name? They get a little exposure, a little money, a little experience, who knows what they could do? And we get a couple of super-easy plats for about the price of a good cup of coffee. Sounds like a win/win. You think that allowing a shit development team to develop a shit product is a win? This isn't about the "little guy catching a break". This is about a "developer" gaming the system to release crap that I could program. This kind of nonsense should never have a door opened for them. 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Undead Wolf Posted February 28, 2018 Share Posted February 28, 2018 3 minutes ago, starcrunch061 said: You mention that you think Sony is afraid of "burning bridges" with developers. But is there really fear of burning the bridge with the developer of Orc Slayer? Or this game? Hell, I would think that Sony would be happy to keep dreck like this off the store, and keep other developers from trying the same crap. Further, I can't imagine that even the most indie of indie developers supports games like Little Adventure on the Prairie (to say nothing of stolen asset games like Solbrain). Not really, no, but Sony would rather avoid that I imagine. I mean it's hard for platform holders to know for definite what games will and won't become a success, so instead, they choose to let everything on. Back before it become a huge success, platform holders/publishers would have scoffed at Minecraft and not seen the appeal in it at all. We all know how that turned out. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Satoshi Ookami Posted February 28, 2018 Share Posted February 28, 2018 (edited) 1 hour ago, starcrunch061 said: fear of burning the bridge with the developer of Orc Slayer? The bridge shouldn't be the only thing that should be burned in this case. Edited February 28, 2018 by Satoshi Ookami 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mecharobot Posted February 28, 2018 Share Posted February 28, 2018 I'd rather Sony just sell people instant generic plats than this. They could be in the store under a special tab called "platinum booster packs". That way those who want their empty numbers can get them without wasting any time, Sony gets money and the store doesn't get clutter. A real win/win scenario. They might be even sold as collectible sets with pretty pictures of playstation products. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SuchRemorse Posted March 2, 2018 Share Posted March 2, 2018 The only thing that made this game "fun" was the constant (BLING) of the trophies unlocking every few minutes. But that's not really fun... That's just my addiction to trophies. I need serious help! ? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Yokolobuna Posted March 8, 2018 Share Posted March 8, 2018 I just wonder how Is it possible to geelit garbage like this. I was looking for some contact to send my thought about this "game" directly to SONY... but surely, it is pointless. This is the worst game I've ever played. Almost like SCAM... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HusKy Posted March 8, 2018 Share Posted March 8, 2018 On 28/02/2018 at 8:04 AM, MMDE said: You don't pay Sony to do that. These days you can pick... that's it really. In that case I'm surprised some games do not have platinums since it's obvious that trophies drive sales up. It would be in every developers interest to add those couple trophies or switch their list for Golds and Silvers to have enough points for Platinum. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MMDE Posted March 8, 2018 Share Posted March 8, 2018 6 minutes ago, HusKyCode said: In that case I'm surprised some games do not have platinums since it's obvious that trophies drive sales up. It would be in every developers interest to add those couple trophies or switch their list for Golds and Silvers to have enough points for Platinum. You should ask them why they don't do it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dark69knight Posted March 8, 2018 Share Posted March 8, 2018 (edited) 11 minutes ago, MMDE said: You should ask them why they don't do it. And even if he ask them why no one will get the answer cuz they don't have one Edited March 8, 2018 by dark69knight Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now