Jump to content

Official SotM IV


cmgravekeeper

Signature of the Month IV  

24 members have voted

  1. 1. Vote for your favorite signature....



Recommended Posts

#3 gets my vote again.

Why is it a tie though? The poll says 1 has 7, and 3 has 8?

Someone probably readjusted their vote rather than posting it. You can vote again in the poll if you delete your previous one.

Someone voted for 3 who had not voted earlier....I'll count it towards the TieBreaker count and also ask them to post it....

And yeah no one readjusted....plus I keep track of the votes so no one abuses the ability to readjust votes....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

hoping I'm allowed to vote...this being my first post here on the forums

didn't see the other two that were originally part of the sotm, but of the two there I like #3 best.

they're both cool, but #1 is too blurry around her arm and while the fx are cool, it's a bit busy for my taste.

#3 is nice and sharp. it's got a good focal and the typo isn't anything special, but it fits.

apparently my vote got lost at the bottom of the page *curses being the last to post on a page*

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just going to post a few tings about each to justify my vote. I'm fairly sure who made what so I'm looking at it as objectively as I can.

2rNnH.png

  • Nice consistent colour scheme
  • Rule of thirds evidently considered
  • Conflicting light sources disrupt things a bit
  • Evident that you had an idea of what you wanted in mind
  • Very cluttered
  • Some depth added
  • Text not so great
  • Border is decent, not great. I'm just not a fan of the low opacity border that goes all the way round (even though I'm guilty of doing it myself in the past)

6h2rf.png

  • Nice consistent colour scheme
  • Decent flow
  • Too sharp. Needs some blurring to remove unnecessary details around the edges and put more focus on the actual focal
  • I'm not a fan of the central placement. Some rule of thirds would have been nice
  • Clear that you had some idea of what you wanted
  • Text is decent
  • Lighting is nice, colours on the character reflect the colours of the background light
  • Could probably be a bit darker

My vote goes to Sig #3

I still think #4 should have won it though. If I remember correctly #4 was pretty good. Go edit the OP so I can see #4 again! >:F

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

__________________________________________________

1st Place: Sparky - 8/23 votes

6h2rf.png

__________________________________________________

2nd Place: cmgravekeeper - 7/23 votes

2rNnH.png

__________________________________________________

3rd Place: orenjikitty - 5/23 votes

JGPtD.png

__________________________________________________

4th Place: FAoOHxSniperFox - 2/23 votes

cnlLr.png

__________________________________________________

Here are the results for SotM IV....congrats to Sparky for a great win....

:)

Thanks to everyone else who entered....the entries were great...wow I came so close to winning my first SotM....

:( ....great win though Sparky! :D ....and yeah I gotta stop being lazy and posting these faster.... xD

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just going to post a few tings about each to justify my vote. I'm fairly sure who made what so I'm looking at it as objectively as I can.

2rNnH.png

  • Nice consistent colour scheme
  • Rule of thirds evidently considered
  • Conflicting light sources disrupt things a bit
  • Evident that you had an idea of what you wanted in mind
  • Very cluttered
  • Some depth added
  • Text not so great
  • Border is decent, not great. I'm just not a fan of the low opacity border that goes all the way round (even though I'm guilty of doing it myself in the past)

Thanks for the CNC.... :P

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...