MosesRockefeller Posted August 29, 2016 Share Posted August 29, 2016 I don't care if they start adding VR titles as long as it doesn't affect the PS4/3/Vita (I mean PSP) titles. I do not now, and cannot imagine ever, have any interest in VR so if it starts affecting the IGC I will be disappointed. I will probably still subscribe for the other benefits, but it will still be disappointing. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stevieboy Posted August 29, 2016 Share Posted August 29, 2016 Puppeteer....think that is the only Move game we ever got. Puppeteer was perfectly playable with a DS3 though, so it wasn't a Move only game. It did have Move compatibility though. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
demonoid321 Posted August 29, 2016 Share Posted August 29, 2016 (edited) I would love to see PSVR titles in the igc. But as Stevieboy said, I don't think they have ever have released any ps move exclusive games aside from one. I don't think Sony ever offered Move controller only games on PS+, so I can't really see them offering VR only games in the future. Part of the idea of the IGC is to offer games to people they might not buy themselves, so by offering VR only games it would potentially cut a large portion of users out. Wait a minute. Wasn't Sack Boy Prehistoric Moves released for the igc? That was a move only game. Edited August 29, 2016 by demonoid321 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stevieboy Posted August 29, 2016 Share Posted August 29, 2016 Wait a minute. Wasn't Sack Boy Prehistoric Moves released for the igc? That was a move only game. I just checked and indeed it was back in Dec 2010, which was before I had a PS+ sub. That was a Move only game too, so maybe VR only games being offered on PS+ can't be ruled out. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Satoshi Ookami Posted August 29, 2016 Share Posted August 29, 2016 They'll probably give them instead of Vita games. Well, not like Vita has games IGC offers games anyway... If they did it, at least we would get something. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
diskdocx Posted August 29, 2016 Share Posted August 29, 2016 Yes VR is a peripheral, but technically so is the Vita and it gets its own IGC games. Um, what now? Please explain how the Vita is 'technically a peripheral'? 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
A12 Posted August 29, 2016 Share Posted August 29, 2016 (edited) Um, what now? Please explain how the Vita is 'technically a peripheral'? It is used as an controller. So by definition... Edited August 29, 2016 by A12 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
diskdocx Posted August 30, 2016 Share Posted August 30, 2016 It is used as an controller. So by definition... It can be used as a controller. The PS3 can be used as a DVD player. Doesn't mean it isn't a console. The Vita has it's own library of games that can only be played on the Vita. The Vita does not require a PS3 or PS4 to function. It is a standalone console, with other features. The PSVR may have it's own library of games, but they still require the PS4 to function. PSVR = peripheral PSVita = console. 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Katt Posted August 30, 2016 Share Posted August 30, 2016 I just checked and indeed it was back in Dec 2010, which was before I had a PS+ sub. That was a Move only game too, so maybe VR only games being offered on PS+ can't be ruled out. I don't like the way this going, not one bit. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Satoshi Ookami Posted August 30, 2016 Share Posted August 30, 2016 It can be used as a controller. The PS3 can be used as a DVD player. Doesn't mean it isn't a console. The Vita has it's own library of games that can only be played on the Vita. The Vita does not require a PS3 or PS4 to function. It is a standalone console, with other features. The PSVR may have it's own library of games, but they still require the PS4 to function. PSVR = peripheral PSVita = console. I would like to agree, but for majority of players, Vita is a peripheral... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Arkthur Posted August 30, 2016 Share Posted August 30, 2016 If they add it as a different platform, there shouldn't be any problems. People already complain a lot about the games we get. Can't imagine what happens when people who don't own VR start getting VR games instead of the regular. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Auto-Tomato Posted August 30, 2016 Share Posted August 30, 2016 Who knows with Sony. I wouldn't read anything into the Plus price hike, other than they know they can do that and the majority will pay up. It might depend how well the VR sells, they're not going to, nor will they get away with, putting VR only titles on the IGC...if it is indeed a small audience. Over time and if it sells really well, possibly, but I'd expect it'd be VR compatible games rather than VR only. The further we move away from the PS3 era though, they could reduce the PS3 to one game and implement a VR only category...but the VR would need to sell big numbers, I would think, before anything like that stood a chance of happening. I could see VR compatible games, especially if they want to push the hardware. Ideally, they could add an extra VR only game, but I dread to think how that might affect the current IGC. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now