rhyperiorx Posted February 11, 2014 Share Posted February 11, 2014 I really liked Arkham Origins single player campaign. I have Blackgate but havent played it. Heard it is terrible. Glitch City it was and it's done by the people who ported "MGS Collection". I think WB are getting bored with Batman to be honest, if they wasn't they would have probably sorted it out by now. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Christopher Posted February 11, 2014 Share Posted February 11, 2014 I refuse to get this game after all the negative feedback, which is dissappointing because I loved and platted the first two. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HaSoOoN-MHD Posted February 11, 2014 Share Posted February 11, 2014 (edited) So many overreactions and melodrama over here. The game wasn't even that glitchy, it's not even near Bethesda levels like people make it out to be. This game comes out with a few glitches, none of them gamebreaking/wide spread at the very least and the entirety of the internet flips out. Telling your customers ''nah we won't fix it'' is not a very smart PR strategy but the game isn't that broken. They definitely need to get their public relations straight, again, but chill everyone. Also, who ever was trying to make it seem like a big corporate scheme because Rocksteady isn't working on a Batman game: they are. Kevin Conroy leaked it over his twitter. For their debut, Origins was a fantastic game and had the best story of a Batman game yet. Edited February 11, 2014 by HaSoOoN-MHD Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
daftprophet Posted February 11, 2014 Share Posted February 11, 2014 (edited) I never said XIII-2 was boring or that people only bought it because it has the words Final Fantasy. I think you might be projecting. I said people were mad that you had to buy DLC to see the ending of the game, which was true. Also, the XIII series is easily one of the worst JRPG series this past generation. Especially when compared to games like Tales, Lost Odyssey, and even Ni No Kuni. XIII wasn't a bad game, but it was by no means a good game either. Completely off topic, but that's your opinion. You did not have to buy DLC to see the ending to FFXIII-2 and XIII was an awesome game. If you can get past the "THIS GAME IS BAD BECAUSE IT WASN'T LIKE THE PREVIOUS ONES" mentality, you wouldn't be so disappointed. But yeah, WarnerBrothers can suck a huge fart for being shitty to their consumers. This is why I haven't gotten the game yet...because it wasn't RockSteady. Edited February 11, 2014 by daftprophet 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wdjat Prinny Doods Posted February 11, 2014 Author Share Posted February 11, 2014 So many overreactions and melodrama over here. The game wasn't even that glitchy, it's not even near Bethesda levels like people make it out to be. This game comes out with a few glitches, none of them gamebreaking/wide spread at the very least and the entirety of the internet flips out. Telling your customers ''nah we won't fix it'' is not a very smart PR strategy but the game isn't that broken. They definitely need to get their public relations straight, again, but chill everyone. Also, who ever was trying to make it seem like a big corporate scheme because Rocksteady isn't working on a Batman game: they are. Kevin Conroy leaked it over his twitter. For their debut, Origins was a fantastic game and had the best story of a Batman game yet. Corrupt saves, framerate issues, freezing, and losing mp progress. How are people who have experienced these problems overreacting? Those are serious issues that need to be addressed. 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HaSoOoN-MHD Posted February 11, 2014 Share Posted February 11, 2014 Frame rate was fixed a week after release on the PS3, losing MP progress I understand but the corrupt saves were fixed for the most part atleast, and heck even City suffered that same problem for a while. Freezing is something that happens with every game and wasn't that big of an issue on this one. From personal experience it ran quite well, so again, I do think this is a remarkably idiotic practice but dishonoring the franchise as ''dead'' ad marking off the studio seems like a huge overreaction to me. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
xzero4812 Posted February 11, 2014 Share Posted February 11, 2014 Frame rate was fixed a week after release on the PS3, losing MP progress I understand but the corrupt saves were fixed for the most part atleast, and heck even City suffered that same problem for a while. Freezing is something that happens with every game and wasn't that big of an issue on this one. From personal experience it ran quite well, so again, I do think this is a remarkably idiotic practice but dishonoring the franchise as ''dead'' ad marking off the studio seems like a huge overreaction to me. like you said from your experiences it was OK, but i can guarantee you that you'd be singing a different tune if you had those issues and for WB to just blatantly state that they're not concerned about the product THEY put out and YOU paid for is just completely absurd. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HaSoOoN-MHD Posted February 11, 2014 Share Posted February 11, 2014 like you said from your experiences it was OK, but i can guarantee you that you'd be singing a different tune if you had those issues and for WB to just blatantly state that they're not concerned about the product THEY put out and YOU paid for is just completely absurd. People are ignoring that they said that they won't necessarily bother with the small glitches, but the game progress halting ones will be addressed. From that point of view the game is in pretty good condition, it's nothing to get too upset about with this particular game. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
xzero4812 Posted February 11, 2014 Share Posted February 11, 2014 People are ignoring that they said that they won't necessarily bother with the small glitches, but the game progress halting ones will be addressed. From that point of view the game is in pretty good condition, it's nothing to get too upset about with this particular game. they said that they have no plans to to release any patches, but if at all they do it will be for major issues, not to mention the stunt they pulled on the DLC for the Wii U ver., all around id say communities outcry would be just http://community.wbgames.com/t5/Support/Patch-1-06-is-it-even-a-possibility/m-p/122949/highlight/true#M15908 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wdjat Prinny Doods Posted February 11, 2014 Author Share Posted February 11, 2014 Frame rate was fixed a week after release on the PS3, losing MP progress I understand but the corrupt saves were fixed for the most part atleast, and heck even City suffered that same problem for a while. Freezing is something that happens with every game and wasn't that big of an issue on this one. From personal experience it ran quite well, so again, I do think this is a remarkably idiotic practice but dishonoring the franchise as ''dead'' ad marking off the studio seems like a huge overreaction to me. I got the game a little over a month after release and had some terrible framerate issues so that cant be true Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Brawler Posted February 11, 2014 Share Posted February 11, 2014 I think if they can't fess up to the fact they messed up and fix their mistakes but still expect you to buy DLC, it's extremely messed up. Really hope they re-think this. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HaSoOoN-MHD Posted February 11, 2014 Share Posted February 11, 2014 http://gamerstherapy.wordpress.com/2013/11/05/batman-arkham-origins-patch-update-v1-3-ps3/ http://pixelenemy.com/batman-arkham-origins-patch-for-ps3-submitted-promises-to-fix-framerate-issue/ Majority of people don't seem to have frame rate issues after that, so I dunno what the issue is for you. The frame rate only ever really dropped around Gotham Bridge, to begin with. they said that they have no plans to to release any patches, but if at all they do it will be for major issues, not to mention the stunt they pulled on the DLC for the Wii U ver., all around id say communities outcry would be just http://community.wbgames.com/t5/Support/Patch-1-06-is-it-even-a-possibility/m-p/122949/highlight/true#M15908 Yeah, the WiiU stuff was a pretty huge middle finger to be frank. And again, major issues, like the people are mentioning here, if they pop up will be addressed. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ZA-TomTom Posted February 11, 2014 Share Posted February 11, 2014 Rocksteady not being the developer made me hesitate to buy it early, I guess I was right (or lucky I had no money at this time)... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bullstomp Posted February 11, 2014 Share Posted February 11, 2014 http://gamerstherapy.wordpress.com/2013/11/05/batman-arkham-origins-patch-update-v1-3-ps3/ http://pixelenemy.com/batman-arkham-origins-patch-for-ps3-submitted-promises-to-fix-framerate-issue/ Majority of people don't seem to have frame rate issues after that, so I dunno what the issue is for you. The frame rate only ever really dropped around Gotham Bridge, to begin with. Yeah, the WiiU stuff was a pretty huge middle finger to be frank. And again, major issues, like the people are mentioning here, if they pop up will be addressed. The Wii U issue, the PS3 Arkham City:GOTY save issue, the "no fixing glitches because we are concentrating on DLC to make us more money" issue. It is pretty clear WB could care less about their client base and most of the people on this thread believe this. You even agree the Wii U incident is a "pretty huge middle finger, to be frank". And despite all that you still contend we're all overreacting. I think you are going against the flow of this thread either because you're entertaining yourself or you're a WB fanboi/employee. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MatCauthon Posted February 11, 2014 Share Posted February 11, 2014 (edited) Listen, I love the Arkham series and I am a big fan for what Rocksteady did for the Dark Knight. BUT WB is building a rep for crappy customer service. Before this, they released Batman: Arkham City GOTY edition. I bought it and traded in my original Arkham City to get it. Makes sense right, swapping the original game for the original game plus all the DLC? Well guess what. The save files for the original Arkham City ARE NOT COMPATIBLE with Arkham City: GOTY on the PlayStation 3 only (works fine on the XBox360). WB made it clear that they are NOT going to do anything to address this and have held true to their word. So the instance in this thread follows suit with their "customer can suck eggs" viewpoint. This is a big reason why I never completed that plat even though I platted Batman: Arkham Asylum . .. Same thing happened to me. I guess I should have done my research better. I ended up buying the used vanilla version again to finish up the plat, but there's not way I'm getting the DLC unless it goes on a deep discount. Edited February 11, 2014 by MatCauthon Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jebusHrice Posted February 11, 2014 Share Posted February 11, 2014 I didn't see many outright bugs but I did have a major problem with the combat. It felt a little off from the previous games. They made it much harder to use gadgets in a fight since it never targeted the nearest enemy meaning I always got hit during the animation. The camera never kept up either so I felt like I was getting cheap shots from enemies I never saw. Just wasn't tight enough to justify a mode where you can only die once (I wish City had that option). I personally also hated that you had to complete the "challenges" in a certain order. Especially since a couple of them were miss able. Either way, just a dreadful experience in my opinion. I didn't really care about Batman but the first two Arkham games were great. Now, I'm not excited about playing any more of these. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HaSoOoN-MHD Posted February 12, 2014 Share Posted February 12, 2014 The Wii U issue, the PS3 Arkham City:GOTY save issue, the "no fixing glitches because we are concentrating on DLC to make us more money" issue. It is pretty clear WB could care less about their client base and most of the people on this thread believe this. You even agree the Wii U incident is a "pretty huge middle finger, to be frank". And despite all that you still contend we're all overreacting. I think you are going against the flow of this thread either because you're entertaining yourself or you're a WB fanboi/employee. Major bugs/glitches will be addressed, again, it's the smaller things that won't be given priority. Also the WiiU wasn't even given online support or pre-order bonuses, this isn't a thing from the devs, it's a publisher problem. I think people are overreacting over this game in particular and it's current state. It runs well now so there is no reason to be upset about it. And considering I get alot of flack for suggesting that Arkham City had a bad story and somewhat repetitive world i'm probably not a Warner Bros. fanboy. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TiNnYzEuS Posted March 24, 2014 Share Posted March 24, 2014 I got the game a week or so ago, played through most of the story and nearly done with the multiplayer. Can't say I have had one glitch so far, I've been hanging on loading for a while in mp but it's always got in game, literally not even one fault for me? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
savageamusement Posted July 5, 2014 Share Posted July 5, 2014 Any reason why this game is showing as both PS3 and VITA on my PSN profile? I really enjoyed this game and would love to have a full Batman Arkham game on VITA (not like Blackgate) but I can't see this happening. Mistake maybe? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
yellowwindow7 Posted July 5, 2014 Share Posted July 5, 2014 yeah i remember reading this a long time ago while browsing the web on my ps3, it said they had no farther plans to fix the bugs and glitches withing the game because they were working on a new story DLC, i was like WTF?? since i was planning to get the game after they fix everything in it but now i'm glad that i didn't and will ever be. all thanks to origins, now i planning to leave the arkham series for good, i might to even skip arkham knights as well even though it was made by rock steady, maybe i will wait to get it used or maybe by the time i get a ps4 which only god know when the game will get some discounts or something. currently we are only seen the bat mobile gameplay, i hope they'll fix or found something better than that freeflow battle system cause it's getting old and clunkier. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mr_Freaker Posted July 5, 2014 Share Posted July 5, 2014 I hope they won't release a GOTY edition without patching things up, because it would be a no brainer to not buy it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
vegetollo7 Posted October 20, 2014 Share Posted October 20, 2014 So my question is should I play the single player with the latest patch update or play it with no patch installed? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
.thumb.jpeg.102a87f7982e8f732c1ca76b07c65be2.jpeg)
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now