Jump to content

Sony will refund consumers over ‘deceiving’ PlayStation Vita ads


kidhero99

Recommended Posts

The FTC's complaint against Sony charges the company with making false claims about the PS Vita's "cross platform gaming" or "cross-save" feature. Sony claimed, for example, that PS Vita users could pause any PS3 game at any time and continue to play the game on their PS Vita from where they left off. This feature, however, was only available for a few PS3 games, and the pause-and-save capability described in the ads varied significantly from game to game. For example, with respect to "MLB 12: The Show," consumers could only save the game to the PS Vita after finishing the entire nine-inning game on their PS3. In addition, Sony failed to inform consumers that to use this feature, purchasers had to buy two versions of the same game – one for their PS3 and one for the PS Vita.

The FTC's complaint also alleges that Sony's PS Vita ads falsely implied that consumers who owned the 3G version of the device (which cost an extra $50 plus monthly fees) could engage in live, multi-player gaming through a 3G network. In fact, consumers could not engage in live, multiplayer gaming.

The complaint further alleges that Sony also falsely claimed that with the "remote play" feature, PS Vita users could easily access their PS3 games on their handheld consoles. In reality, most PS3 games were not remote playable on the PS Vita. Sony also misled consumers by falsely claiming that PS Vita users could remotely play the popular PS3 game, Killzone 3, on the PS Vita. In fact, Sony never enabled remote play on its Killzone 3 game title, and very few, if any, PS3 games of similar size and complexity were remote playable on the PS Vita.

 

http://venturebeat.com/2014/11/25/sony-will-refund-consumers-over-deceiving-playstation-vita-ads/

 

I'll certainly be taking that $50 PSN credit.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I purchased mine a few weeks after release day, but created 3 different accounts since that day, because of that false advertisement. So how will they handle this? I dont even know, if my E-Mail of my first account is still accesable, or not... :huh:

 

Edit: In addition to that, I live in the EU. Will we also see a refund 50€ worth?

Edited by Killua-ID
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Off to my purchase history I go...!


Ok 2 things:

 

1. Motorstorm RC was a free download in the Playstation Store before the June 1st 2012...does this count?

2. The instant game collection titles that we got with our subscription to PS + (Uncharted Golden Abyss, Gravity Rush, Tales from Space: Mutant Blob Attacks)...do these count?

 

I bought my Vita on launch day, btw

Edited by merciful84
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Here is the page from the actual FTC, not someone covering the news: http://www.ftc.gov/news-events/press-releases/2014/11/sony-computer-entertainment-america-provide-consumer-refunds

 

 

Did they say when we're supposed to get an email about it. I had mine since launch.

 

"The Commission vote to accept both proposed consent orders for public comment was 5-0. The FTC will publish a description of the consent agreement packages in the Federal Register shortly. The agreement will be subject to public comment for 30 days, beginning today and continuing through December 29, 2014, after which the Commission will decide whether to make them final."

 

Edit: In addition to that, I live in the EU. Will we also see a refund 50€ worth?

 

The FTC is based in the USA, I doubt you will be affected.

 

Hoping Sony goes by Trophy dates. I don't have my receipt anymore but I definitely bought my Vita in February of 2012 according to my trophy list. 

 

 

They should be able to track mine either by my protection plan registration or Welcome Park trophy dates

 

Sony can see when a Vita first accessed the PSN, but there are no details for sure yet. Stay tuned to the link above for news from the source.


People may be happy with this, but i think it will have a good impact on Sony budget for games development.

 

Every corporation has a percentage of income set aside for legal issues. For everyone that chooses the credit option, this surely costs Sony significantly less than the refunds as they're just giving out their IP. With Sony's structure, PS4/PSTV/Vita/PS3 current sales trends and restructuring as a company to focus less on less profitable divisions, I don't think this will have ANY impact on Sony's budget for games development.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think the moment you signed in to PSN on your Vita, that device got recorded on your account. I reckon the only thing that may prevent someone from getting the refund would be if they used an invalid email to register their PSN ID. Hmm... well, then there's also that grey area of purchasing before the cut-off date but not signing in until after. (EDIT: This will probably be covered by the "reasonably identify" portion of the settlement. [Thanks, DaivRules, for the link to the FTC posting].)

$50 notwithstanding, I'm pretty happy about this. I bought the 3G version AND subscribed to the AT&T service, and that was 99% worthless.

Edited by DaisyVilla102
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The thing is, all of Sony's claims are valid. Cross-save works. Cross-purchase works. Remote Play for PS3 works. MP over 3G works. The shit all worked, it's the game publishers and poor games sales that let them down.

 

The only claim that proved to be false was Remote Play for Killzone 3, which is a daft oversight given it was central to the promotional campaign. That said, we can Remote Play every game on PS4, so it's swings and roundabouts.

Edited by ant1th3s1s
  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The thing is, all of Sony's claims are valid. Cross-save works. Cross-purchase works. Remote Play for PS3 works. MP over 3G works. The shit all worked, it's the game publishers and poor games sales that let them down.

 

The only claim that proved to be false was Remote Play for Killzone 3, which is a daft oversight given it was central to the promotional campaign. That said, we can Remote Play every game on PS4, so it's swings and roundabouts.

I never tried MP over 3G, but at the least I was unable to 1) check messages, 2) look at or update online trophies, 3) download updates for games [but the game still knew I needed an update and wouldn't run without it], or 4) see my friends list. The only use I got out of it was that it would let me play games (for example, Rayman Origins) that required me to be connected to PSN. I suppose one could argue that the commercial never came straight out and said "every single feature of PSN will still be available over 3G", but for me the implication was there. Between AT&T and Sony, there certainly were no warnings that PSN functionality would be severely limited. And at $15 per month for 256MB of data, one would expect more bang for one's buck. Even if it was only one "bang" per month, so to speak, at that amount of data. (Nudge, nudge, wink, wink. --sorry, couldn't resist it!) :-P

I'm not saying I thought it was a class-action lawsuit-worthy issue, only that I'm not going to feel guilty about redeeming that $50 credit, unlike how I felt about other similar situations.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...